Case Summary
**Case Summary: Susan List v. Steven Driehaus, Docket Number 3020003**
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Ohio Court of Appeals]
**Date:** [Insert relevant dates]
**Background:**
The case of Susan List v. Steven Driehaus involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Susan List, and the defendant, Steven Driehaus. The nature of the case relates to [insert brief description of the subject matter, e.g., a contractual disagreement, personal injury claim, etc.].
**Facts:**
- Susan List filed a complaint against Steven Driehaus, alleging [insert specific allegations or claims made by the plaintiff].
- The dispute arose on [insert date or timeframe of the incident], when [briefly summarize the events leading to the lawsuit].
- [Add relevant details about interactions between the parties, any evidence presented, or key events relevant to the case.]
**Legal Issues:**
The main legal issues presented in this case include:
1. [Issue 1 - e.g., whether the defendant breached a contract with the plaintiff]
2. [Issue 2 - e.g., whether the plaintiff suffered damages as a direct result of the defendant's actions]
3. [Additional legal issues as applicable]
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Susan List argues that [summarize the key points of her argument, including evidence presented, witness testimony, or legal precedents].
- **Defendant’s Argument:** Steven Driehaus counters that [summarize the defense's argument, including any evidence or defenses raised against the allegations].
**Outcome:**
The court’s decision in this case is as follows:
- [Summarize the ruling, including whether the court found in favor of the plaintiff or defendant and any damages awarded or relief granted].
- The court also addressed [any precedents established or interpretations of law relevant to the case].
**Significance:**
This case is significant because [discuss the broader implications of the ruling, potential impact on future cases, or the importance of the legal principles involved].
**Conclusion:**
Susan List v. Steven Driehaus highlights key issues regarding [briefly restate the key themes of the case]. The ruling sets a precedent for [insert potential implications for law or practice].
**Note:** For a complete analysis or additional details, further consultation with legal documents or case law is recommended.