Case Summary
**Case Summary: Suzette Wood v. Midland Funding LLC**
**Docket Number:** 4616192
**Court:** [Insert Name of Court, if known]
**Date:** [Insert Date, if known]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Suzette Wood
- **Defendant:** Midland Funding LLC
**Background:**
Suzette Wood filed a case against Midland Funding LLC, alleging violations related to debt collection practices. The case centers on claims regarding the legitimacy of the debt, alleged improper collection tactics, and potential violations of consumer protection laws.
**Key Issues:**
1. Whether Midland Funding LLC engaged in unlawful or deceptive debt collection practices.
2. The validity and accuracy of the debt claimed by Midland Funding LLC against Suzette Wood.
3. Potential violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and other relevant consumer protection statutes.
**Facts:**
- Suzette Wood may have disputed the existence or amount of the debt claimed by Midland Funding LLC.
- There may have been instances of alleged harassment, misleading communications, or failure to provide necessary information regarding the debt.
- The case likely involves an examination of the documentation provided by Midland Funding LLC to substantiate their claim.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Suzette Wood contends that Midland Funding LLC's practices were unfair and outside the bounds of lawful debt collection. She seeks damages and any necessary relief due to the alleged infractions that negatively impacted her.
- **Defendant's Argument:** Midland Funding LLC may argue that the debt is valid and that their collection practices were in accordance with applicable laws. They could also claim that they acted within their rights to collect the debt.
**Outcome:**
[Insert outcome if available, such as whether the case was dismissed, settled, or resulted in a trial verdict, as well as any awarded damages or remedies.]
**Significance:**
This case underscores the importance of consumer rights in debt collection and the legal obligations of debt collectors to adhere to fair practices. It may also highlight the need for transparency in debt validation processes and consumers' rights to dispute inaccurate claims.
---
**Note:** This summary is a hypothetical template and should be customized with specific details related to the actual case of Suzette Wood v. Midland Funding LLC, including the court's final decision and any notable comments from the judge if available.