Case Summary
**Case Summary: SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 2638390
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court name, e.g., United States District Court]
**Date:** [Insert date of judgment or relevant dates]
**Background:**
SynQor, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Artesyn Technologies, Inc., alleging infringement of several patents related to power conversion technologies. SynQor, a company specializing in DC-DC converters, claimed that Artesyn used its patented technologies without permission in its own products, which constituted patent infringement.
**Key Facts:**
- SynQor holds multiple patents that cover various aspects of power conversion technology, particularly in the manufacture of DC-DC converters used in telecommunications and computing applications.
- Artesyn Technologies, a competitor in the power supply market, was accused of producing and selling products that incorporated technologies that SynQor claimed were patented.
- The case involved detailed technical analyses and discussions regarding the validity of the patents in question and whether Artesyn's products fell within the claimed scope of SynQor's patents.
**Issues:**
1. Whether Artesyn's products infringed on SynQor's patents.
2. The validity of SynQor's patents in light of prior art.
3. Potential damages and remedies for SynQor if infringement was established.
**Rulings:**
The court ultimately ruled [insert ruling details, e.g., in favor of SynQor, finding that Artesyn had infringed on the patents, or in favor of Artesyn, dismissing SynQor's claims]. The decision also addressed considerations such as the injunction against Artesyn, potential monetary damages, and the enforcement of SynQor's patent rights.
**Conclusion:**
The case underscored important considerations in patent law, particularly in the technological space of power conversion and the implications of patent rights in competitive industries. The ruling served to clarify the scope of SynQor's patents and set a precedent for future cases involving similar technology-based patent disputes.
**Note:** Further details regarding the specific findings, legal reasoning, and any concurring or dissenting opinions by the court should be included based on actual case documentation if available.