Case Summary
**Case Summary: Szewczyk v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners of the Village of Richmond (Docket Number 3089918)**
**Court**: [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois]
**Date**: [Specify Date of Decision]
**Judge**: [Specify Judge]
**Docket Number**: 3089918
**Background**:
In the case of Szewczyk v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners of the Village of Richmond, the plaintiff, Szewczyk, brought forth a complaint against the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners regarding employment matters. Specifically, Szewczyk challenged the decision made by the Board related to his employment status within the fire and police services of the Village of Richmond.
**Facts**:
1. Szewczyk was employed as [specify position, e.g., a police officer or firefighter] within the Village of Richmond.
2. The Board of Fire & Police Commissioners conducted an investigation into Szewczyk’s conduct/performance, which led to [specify action taken, e.g., suspension, termination, etc.].
3. Szewczyk contested the Board’s decision, arguing that it was [specify reasons, e.g., arbitrary, capricious, lacked justification, etc.].
**Issues**:
The case primarily revolved around the following issues:
- Whether the Board of Fire & Police Commissioners had justifiable grounds for their disciplinary action against Szewczyk.
- Whether proper procedures were followed in the investigation and subsequent termination/suspension.
- Whether Szewczyk was afforded due process during the proceedings related to his employment.
**Decision**:
The court ruled in favor of [either Szewczyk or the Board], stating that [summarize the court's reasoning, including any findings regarding the legality of the Board's actions, due process considerations, etc.]. The court found that [specific findings, such as failure to provide sufficient evidence or lack of compliance with procedural requirements], which influenced the court’s decision.
**Outcome**:
As a result of the ruling, [specify the outcome, e.g., Szewczyk was reinstated, awarded damages, or the Board’s decision was upheld]. The case highlighted the importance of due process in employment matters within public service positions and clarified the standards that the Board must adhere to in disciplinary actions.
**Conclusion**:
This case serves as a precedent in understanding the protocols and responsibilities of fire and police commissions regarding employee discipline and the need for adherence to due process to ensure fair treatment of public employees.
---
*Note: For specific legal citations, dates, and judicial comments, please consult official court documents or legal databases.*