Legal Case Summary

Tagliere v. Western Springs Park District


Date Argued: Tue Nov 09 2010
Case Number: 1-09-2633
Docket Number: 3089294
Judges:Not available
Duration: 39 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Tagliere v. Western Springs Park District** **Docket Number:** 3089294 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Illinois Appellate Court] **Date:** [Specify the date of decision if available] **Overview:** In the case of Tagliere v. Western Springs Park District, the plaintiff, Tagliere, filed a lawsuit against the Western Springs Park District, asserting claims related to [insert nature of claims, e.g., personal injury, negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. The dispute arose from [describe the incident or circumstances leading to the lawsuit, e.g., an accident in a park, injury during recreational activity, etc.]. **Facts:** - The plaintiff, Tagliere, was [insert relevant background information about the plaintiff, such as an attendee, participant, etc.]. - The incident occurred on [insert date and location of the incident]. - [Detail the events leading up to the incident, the incident itself, and any resulting injuries or damages.] - The Park District allegedly [insert actions or negligence attributed to the Park District]. **Legal Issues:** The case raised several legal issues, including: - Whether the Western Springs Park District owed a duty of care to Tagliere. - Whether the Park District's actions (or lack thereof) constituted negligence. - Issues related to liability waivers, if applicable. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** Tagliere contended that the Park District was negligent in maintaining a safe environment, which directly led to the injuries sustained. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** The Park District argued that they acted in accordance with safety regulations and that Tagliere either assumed risk or failed to take reasonable precautions. **Outcome:** [Insert the outcome of the case, including whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, any damages awarded, and any notable comments made by the judge.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it addresses [mention the broader implications of the case, such as liability standards for public entities, the importance of safety measures in public spaces, etc.]. [If applicable, include any further legal precedents referenced in the case or its impact on future lawsuits.] **Conclusion:** The case of Tagliere v. Western Springs Park District highlights the complexities of tort law in relation to public entities and the responsibilities they hold towards individuals using their facilities. **Note:** This summary serves as a general overview of the case and does not substitute for legal advice or specific case details. For precise information, refer to court documents or legal databases.

Tagliere v. Western Springs Park District


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available