Case Summary
**Case Summary: Tara Sherwin v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company, Docket Number 3053784**
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Circuit Court, Appellate Court, etc.]
**Filing Date:** [Insert filing date if known]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Tara Sherwin
- **Defendant:** Infinity Auto Insurance Company
**Background:**
Tara Sherwin filed a lawsuit against Infinity Auto Insurance Company, asserting claims related to an automobile insurance policy. The key issues involved the coverage terms of the policy, the insurer's handling of a claim made by Sherwin, and whether the insurer acted in bad faith or breached the insurance contract.
**Facts:**
1. **Insurance Policy:** Tara Sherwin held an automobile insurance policy with Infinity Auto Insurance Company, which purportedly covered damages resulting from an accident.
2. **Incident:** [Details of the incident leading to the claim, including date, nature of the accident, and damages incurred.]
3. **Claim Submission:** After the incident, Sherwin submitted a claim to Infinity for the damages sustained, expecting coverage under her policy.
4. **Response from Infinity:** Infinity Auto Insurance Company responded to the claim, leading to a dispute over the interpretation of policy provisions, coverage limits, and the adequacy of the investigation conducted by the insurer.
**Legal Issues:**
- Whether Infinity Auto Insurance Company properly interpreted and applied the terms of the insurance policy.
- Whether the insurer acted in bad faith in its claims handling.
- The extent of damages owed to Sherwin under the policy.
**Procedural History:**
- The case was filed by Tara Sherwin in [insert court name], seeking a remedy for the alleged breach of contract and bad faith claims handling.
- [Insert any key procedural events such as motions filed, hearings, etc., if available.]
**Outcome:**
At the time of this summary, the case is either ongoing or has reached a conclusion with a verdict or settlement. If concluded, specify the findings of the court, awarding damages, or dismissing the claims.
**Significance:**
This case highlights the obligations of insurance companies in handling claims and the potential legal ramifications they face when disputes arise over policy interpretation and coverage issues. It serves as a pertinent example of the legal principles governing insurance contracts and the protections available to policyholders.
[Note: Specific details pertaining to the court's decision, amounts awarded, or specific legal precedents cited should be included if known.]