Legal Case Summary

Tarselli v. Superintendent Greene SCI


Date Argued: Tue May 23 2017
Case Number: 16-3521
Docket Number: 6065282
Judges:Not available
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Tarselli v. Superintendent Greene SCI, Docket No. 6065282** **Court**: [Court Name] **Date**: [Filing Date] **Parties**: - **Petitioner**: [Petitioner’s Full Name, Tarselli] - **Respondent**: Superintendent of Greene SCI **Background**: The case of Tarselli v. Superintendent Greene SCI involves a petition filed by Tarselli against the superintendent of the Greene State Correctional Institution (SCI). The petitioner, Tarselli, was challenging certain conditions or actions taken during incarceration at Greene SCI, potentially related to issues such as confinement conditions, disciplinary actions, or other matters concerning his rights as an inmate. **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues in this case may include: - Violation of the petitioner’s rights under federal or state law. - Due process concerns regarding disciplinary actions taken by the prison administration. - Eighth Amendment implications regarding cruel and unusual punishment. - Procedural or substantive claims relating to the treatment of inmates. **Arguments**: - **Petitioner’s Argument**: Tarselli likely argues that his legal rights were violated due to [specific conditions or actions], requesting the court to reverse or modify the actions taken by the superintendent. - **Respondent’s Argument**: The superintendent’s defense may rely on justifications for the actions taken, asserting compliance with institutional policies, adherence to legal standards, and the necessity of maintaining order within the correctional facility. **Court's Findings**: The court would examine the presented evidence, including: - Documentation of the conditions at Greene SCI. - Records of any disciplinary procedures employed against Tarselli. - Testimonies or affidavits supporting either the petitioner’s claims or the superintendent's responses. **Ruling**: [The case summary should include a brief description of the court’s ruling, whether it was favorable to Tarselli or the superintendent, and any relief provided or restrictions imposed.] **Conclusion**: The ruling in Tarselli v. Superintendent Greene SCI clarifies the legal standards regarding inmate rights and the responsibilities of correctional facility administrators. The decision may set a precedent for future cases involving similar issues in the realm of prison law and inmate rights. **Notes**: - Future implications for correctional practices could arise from the court's decision. - The case highlights ongoing discussions about the treatment of inmates and the legal protections afforded to them under U.S. law. [Ensure to replace placeholders and add specific details regarding the court's findings and ruling if they were available.]

Tarselli v. Superintendent Greene SCI


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available