Case Summary
**Case Summary: Tatiana Korolshteyn v. Costco, Docket Number 8163290**
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court, [State]]
**Date Filed:** [Specify date of filing]
**Plaintiff:** Tatiana Korolshteyn
**Defendant:** Costco Wholesale Corporation
**Case Overview:**
Tatiana Korolshteyn filed a lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation, alleging personal injury resulting from a slip and fall incident that occurred on Costco's premises. The plaintiff claims that due to the negligence of Costco in maintaining a safe environment for its customers, she suffered physical injuries and emotional distress.
**Facts of the Case:**
- On [insert date of incident], the plaintiff visited a Costco location.
- During her visit, she allegedly slipped on a wet surface that lacked proper signage or barriers to warn customers of the hazard.
- The plaintiff suffered [describe nature of injuries, e.g., fractures, sprains] and required medical treatment.
- Her complaint includes claims for medical expenses, lost wages, and compensation for pain and suffering.
**Legal Claims:**
The primary legal claims asserted by the plaintiff are based on negligence. Specifically, she argues that Costco:
1. Failed to maintain the premises in a safe condition.
2. Failed to warn customers of hazardous conditions.
3. Was aware of the potential risks and did not take appropriate actions to mitigate them.
**Defendant's Response:**
Costco denied any negligence and asserted that the plaintiff may have contributed to her own injuries by not exercising due care while walking in the store. Costco also argued that it had proper preventative measures in place and that any issues were promptly addressed.
**Current Status:**
As of [insert current status, e.g., "pending trial," "settled out of court," etc.], the case is [describe any ongoing motions, discovery processes, or upcoming trial dates].
**Jurisdictional Issues:**
[Discuss if there are any jurisdictional issues relevant to the case, if applicable.]
**Conclusion:**
This case is significant as it addresses premises liability and the responsibilities of large retail companies in ensuring customer safety. Both parties are expected to present evidence to support their claims, and the outcome will depend on the court's assessment of negligence and liability.
**[Optional: Any additional notes about potential implications for other similar cases or retail practices.]**
Please note that specific details such as dates, injuries, and other particulars should be inserted or adjusted based on the actual case records or available information.