Case Summary
**Case Summary: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC v. Permanent Easement for 70.53 Acres**
**Docket Number:** 83-42374
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court name]
**Date:** [Insert the date of the case]
**Overview:**
The case of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC v. Permanent Easement for 70.53 Acres involves the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company seeking to secure a permanent easement on a specific parcel of land totaling 70.53 acres. The company aims to use this land for its pipeline infrastructure, which is essential for the transportation of natural gas.
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC (TGP)
- **Defendant:** Landowners (specific names not provided)
**Facts:**
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC, is involved in the operation of natural gas pipelines and has plans to expand its network to facilitate energy transport and fulfill contractual obligations. The proposed easement is necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of its pipeline facilities. The land in question is owned by the defendants, who are resisting the granting of the easement.
**Legal Issues:**
The fundamental legal issues in this case include:
1. Whether Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company has the right to exercise eminent domain to secure the easement.
2. The valuation of the land and potential compensation owed to the landowners for the permanent easement.
3. The impact of the easement on the landowners' rights and use of the property.
**Arguments:**
- **For the Plaintiff:** TGP argues that the acquisition of a permanent easement is essential for infrastructure development and public benefit. The company contends that it has adhered to all legal requirements and has made efforts to negotiate with the landowners but has been unable to reach an agreement.
- **For the Defendant:** The landowners argue against the necessity of the easement and question the interpretative merits of eminent domain in this context. They may raise concerns about insufficient compensation, the impact on their property rights, and environmental implications.
**Outcome:**
[Insert details about the court's ruling, any compensations awarded, agreements made, or other resolutions.]
**Significance:**
This case highlights the balance between private property rights and the needs of public utility companies. It explores the legal principles surrounding eminent domain, the valuation of land for easement purposes, and the rights of landowners in the face of corporate expansion.
**Conclusion:**
The Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC v. Permanent Easement for 70.53 Acres case serves as an important examination of the legal frameworks governing easements and property rights, with implications for similar cases involving utility companies and private landowners.
**Note:** For a complete understanding, it is advisable to refer to further documentation including transcripts, legal briefs, and rulings in the case.