Legal Case Summary

Teresa Phelps v. City of Parma


Date Argued: Thu Dec 07 2017
Case Number: 16-35278
Docket Number: 6237989
Judges:O'scannlain, Tallman, Watford
Duration: 29 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Teresa Phelps v. City of Parma (Docket No. 6237989)** **Court**: [Specify the court, e.g., Ohio Court of Appeals] **Date**: [Insert filing date, if known] **Background**: Teresa Phelps filed a lawsuit against the City of Parma regarding [insert specific issue, e.g., alleged negligence, wrongful termination, discrimination, etc.]. The case involves claims related to [briefly describe the nature of the complaint, the events leading up to it, and any relevant background information concerning the parties involved]. **Facts**: - Teresa Phelps, the plaintiff, claims that [specific facts about the incident, such as dates, actions taken by city employees, and any relevant interactions between Phelps and the City of Parma]. - The City of Parma, as the defendant, [describe the city's response, any defenses raised, and relevant policies or regulations involved]. - [Include any important evidence presented, such as witness testimonies, documents, or other supporting materials]. **Legal Issues**: 1. [Define the primary legal issue(s) presented in the case, such as interpretation of a specific law, procedural matters, or any constitutional questions.] 2. [If applicable, mention any lower court decisions or administrative rulings that are relevant to the case.] **Court’s Analysis**: - The court [outline the key points of the court's reasoning, including references to legal precedents, statutory interpretations, and application of relevant laws to the facts of the case]. - Emphasis was placed on [specific factors the court considered critical in reaching a decision]. **Outcome**: - The court ruled in favor of [plaintiff/defendant], stating that [summarize the court's verdict and any orders issued, such as damages awarded or injunctions imposed]. - The ruling [discuss any implications of the verdict, such as appeals, changes to city policy, or potential impacts on similar cases]. **Conclusion**: Case No. 6237989, Teresa Phelps v. City of Parma, highlights the complexities involved in [discuss the broader implications of the case]. The decision reflects [any concluding thoughts on the significance of the case]. **Notes**: - [Optionally, provide any dates for hearings, further legal proceedings, or significant deadlines.] This summary provides an overview of the Teresa Phelps v. City of Parma case for reference and understanding of its implications within the context of municipal law and citizens' rights.

Teresa Phelps v. City of Parma


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available