Case Summary
**Case Summary: Thai I-Mei Frozen Foods v. United States, Docket Number 2606699**
**Court:** United States Court of International Trade
**Date:** [Insert Date Here]
**Docket Number:** 2606699
**Background:**
Thai I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. (Plaintiff) is a producer and exporter of frozen foods based in Thailand. The company was involved in a legal dispute with the United States government (Defendant) concerning the Department of Commerce's (DOC) determination related to the anti-dumping duties imposed on certain frozen shrimp imports. This case arose from an administrative review of those duties, which Thai I-Mei contended were improperly calculated.
**Facts:**
The Department of Commerce conducted an anti-dumping administrative review for the period in question. During this review, Thai I-Mei challenged several aspects of the DOC's methodology, including the calculation of the dumping margin and the application of specific accounting practices that the DOC used to assess the value of exports. Thai I-Mei argued that the methods employed by the DOC were inconsistent with the statutory criteria and did not accurately reflect the fair value of their products.
**Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case included:
1. Whether the Department of Commerce's calculations of the anti-dumping duties were supported by substantial evidence.
2. Whether the DOC's methodology for assessing the fair value of Thai I-Mei's frozen shrimp complied with the relevant trade laws and regulations.
3. Whether Thai I-Mei was entitled to a recalculation of its dumping margins based on its appeals regarding the methodologies used.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Thai I-Mei):** The company argued that the DOC's determination was flawed due to the reliance on inaccurate data and methodologies that did not reflect the actual market conditions. Thai I-Mei asserted that these inaccuracies led to an artificially inflated dumping margin, which unfairly affected their competitive position in the U.S. market.
- **Defendant (United States):** The government defended the DOC's methodologies, asserting that they complied with applicable trade laws and were based on sound statistical practices. The government contended that the calculations were transparent and justifiable based on the data collected during the administrative review.
**Outcome:**
The United States Court of International Trade's ruling in this matter addressed the validity of the DOC's methods and findings. The court evaluated the claims made by both parties and reviewed the evidence and methodologies challenged by Thai I-Mei.
**Conclusion:**
The court ultimately ruled [insert ruling details here], affirming or overturning the DOC's calculations and providing guidance on the methodologies to be used in future anti-dumping reviews. The case reinforced the importance of fair and transparent methods in calculating dumping margins and highlighted the rights of foreign exporters to contest unfair trade practices.
**Significance:**
This case is significant as it illustrates the complexities involved in international trade law, particularly regarding anti-dumping measures. It underscores the tension between protecting domestic industries and ensuring fair competition for foreign exporters.
(Note: Please insert specific dates, ruling details, and additional context as needed, as the summary is based on hypothetical context and may not reflect actual case outcomes.)