Case Summary
**Case Summary: The Ray Charles Foundation v. Raenee Robinson**
**Docket Number:** 2634120
**Court:** [Specify Court, if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision, if known]
**Background:**
The case of The Ray Charles Foundation v. Raenee Robinson centers around the issues of intellectual property rights and the unauthorized use of the legacy of the late musician Ray Charles. The Ray Charles Foundation, established to preserve and promote the musical legacy of Ray Charles and to provide charitable contributions, filed a lawsuit against Raenee Robinson.
**Facts:**
The Ray Charles Foundation claims that Raenee Robinson, without proper authorization, has used Ray Charles' name, image, or likeness in a manner that misrepresents her association with the Foundation and the Ray Charles brand. The Foundation argues that such actions infringe upon their trademark rights and violate their ability to control the use of Ray Charles' legacy, which they have a fiduciary duty to protect.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case include:
1. Whether Raenee Robinson's use of Ray Charles' name/image constitutes trademark infringement.
2. Whether the Foundation has appropriately demonstrated damages resulting from Robinson's actions.
3. Issues related to the right of publicity and how it applies to Ray Charles’ estate.
**Arguments:**
- The Ray Charles Foundation contends that the unauthorized use devalues the brand and causes confusion among the public regarding the relationship between the parties.
- Raenee Robinson may argue that her use falls within permissible bounds, potentially claiming fair use, or that there is no likelihood of confusion among consumers regarding the origin of her goods/services.
**Outcome:**
The court's decision is pending or has not been specified in the summary. The ruling will likely hinge on the interpretation of trademark law, the rights of publicity associated with the deceased, and any evidence presented regarding consumer confusion or damages.
**Significance:**
This case underscores the importance of protecting the legacies of iconic figures and the legal complexities involved in the use of names and likenesses in commerce. The outcome may set precedents relating to trademark rights and the posthumous protection of an individual's image and legacy.
**Conclusion:**
As the legal proceedings unfold, the implications for both the Ray Charles Foundation in its efforts to protect the legacy of Ray Charles and for Raenee Robinson in terms of her rights to utilize this legacy will become clearer, potentially impacting future cases involving the estates of famous personalities.
*Note: This summary is based on hypothetical elements for illustrative purposes, as specifics about the case, including its location and timing, are not provided.*