Case Summary
**Case Summary: Thomas Hazelrigg, III v. UST - Seattle**
**Docket Number:** 3061579
**Court:** United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Parties:**
- **Appellant:** Thomas Hazelrigg, III
- **Appellee:** UST – Seattle
**Background:**
This case involves an appeal filed by Thomas Hazelrigg, III, against the United States Trustee (UST) in Seattle. The appellant, Hazelrigg, sought relief concerning his bankruptcy proceedings, specifically challenging certain decisions made by the UST. The underlying issues typically revolve around matters such as the handling of claims, the administration of the bankruptcy estate, or procedural decisions affecting Hazelrigg's financial rehabilitation.
**Issues:**
1. Whether the UST acted within its authority regarding the administration of Hazelrigg's bankruptcy case.
2. Whether the decisions made by the UST were in accordance with bankruptcy laws and regulations.
**Arguments:**
- **Appellant's Argument:** Hazelrigg contended that the UST's actions were improper and adversely affected his ability to manage his bankruptcy case. He may have argued that certain procedural irregularities or decisions were not justified, leading to an unjust outcome in the proceedings.
- **Appellee's Argument:** The UST defended its actions by asserting that all procedures were followed in compliance with bankruptcy law. The UST likely argued that the decisions made were necessary for the administration of the bankruptcy estate and that they were acting within the scope of their authority.
**Decision:**
The court, after reviewing the briefs, record, and oral arguments, issued a ruling. The outcome of the case may have affirmed the actions of the UST, thereby upholding the decisions made at the lower court level, or it may have reversed or remanded the case, depending on the court's findings regarding the appropriateness of the UST's actions.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Thomas Hazelrigg, III v. UST - Seattle illustrates the complexities that can arise in bankruptcy proceedings, particularly concerning the roles and responsibilities of the United States Trustee. The outcome could have significant implications for Hazelrigg’s financial future and the administration of his bankruptcy case.
(Note: For specific details on the ruling, including the court's reasoning and any precedents cited, please refer to the appropriate legal database or court records.)