Legal Case Summary

Thomas Loden, Jr. v. Rick McCarty


Date Argued: Tue Dec 16 2014
Case Number: M2013-01084-CCA-R3-CD
Docket Number: 2616123
Judges:Not available
Duration: 59 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Thomas Loden, Jr. v. Rick McCarty** **Docket Number**: 2616123 **Court**: [Specify court if known] **Date of Ruling**: [Specify date if known] **Background**: Thomas Loden, Jr. filed a legal action against Rick McCarty, raising several issues that necessitated judicial review. The specifics of the case involve disputes related to [insert specific details about the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, negligence, etc.]. **Facts**: - Plaintiff Thomas Loden, Jr. accused defendant Rick McCarty of [specific allegations]. - The events leading to the lawsuit took place on [insert date and location]. - [Briefly explain the circumstances surrounding the case, including key actions taken by both parties and significant events leading up to the litigation]. **Issues**: 1. [Identify the primary legal questions that the court needed to address, e.g., Was there a breach of duty?] 2. [Additional legal issues that were part of the case, if applicable.] **Arguments**: - **Plaintiff’s Arguments**: Loden contended that McCarty’s actions resulted in [explain nature of harm or damage, basis of claims]. - **Defendant’s Arguments**: McCarty maintained that [explain defense, rebuttal, or counterclaims made]. **Decision**: The court ruled in favor of [plaintiff/defendant], determining that [summarize the court's findings and rationale]. The ruling was based on [insert any significant legal principles the court relied on, such as precedents or statutes]. **Outcome**: As a result of the court's decision, [describe the implications for both parties, including any awarded damages, injunctive relief, or other remedies]. **Significance**: This case is significant as it addresses [mention any legal principles at stake, implications for future cases, or changes in legal precedent]. **Conclusion**: The ruling in Thomas Loden, Jr. v. Rick McCarty serves as an important interpretation of [specific area of law] and highlights the court's stance on [specific issue]. **Notes**: [Include any additional relevant notes about appeals, subsequent proceedings, if known, or key legal principles derived from the case.] --- *Please fill in the specific details where needed, as the above is a template and lacks precise information about the case.*

Thomas Loden, Jr. v. Rick McCarty


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available