Legal Case Summary

Thomas Zaborowski v. MHN Government Svcs


Date Argued: Tue Nov 18 2014
Case Number: M2013-02485-CCA-R3-PC
Docket Number: 2605652
Judges:Martinez, Gould, Watford
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Thomas Zaborowski v. MHN Government Services** **Docket Number**: 2605652 **Court**: [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court, State Court] **Date**: [Specify Date of Filing or Judgment] **Parties**: - **Plaintiff**: Thomas Zaborowski - **Defendant**: MHN Government Services **Background**: Thomas Zaborowski filed a lawsuit against MHN Government Services, alleging [briefly state the nature of the claim, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, breach of contract]. The plaintiff contends that the defendant engaged in actions that violated [state relevant laws, regulations, or contractual obligations]. **Facts**: - Thomas Zaborowski was employed by MHN Government Services as [describe position or role]. - [Outline key facts leading to the dispute, such as dates of employment, specific incidents that led to the claim, and any relevant communications or actions taken by both parties.] - The plaintiff claims [detail the claims made by Zaborowski, including any attempts to resolve the issue before litigation, if applicable]. **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues in this case revolve around [list main legal questions, such as whether the plaintiff was wrongfully terminated, whether discrimination occurred, etc.]. The court will need to determine if the defendant's actions constituted a violation of [mention relevant laws/standards that apply]. **Arguments**: - **Plaintiff's Argument**: Zaborowski argues that [summarize the plaintiff's position and reasoning, including evidence to support claims, such as witness testimonies, documentation, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument**: MHN Government Services asserts that [summarize the defendant's position, including any defenses raised such as justifications for the actions taken or lack of liability]. **Outcome**: [If the case has been resolved, provide a brief summary of the outcome, including any rulings, judgments, or settlements. If ongoing, state that the case is in progress and possibly outline the next steps or expected timeline.] **Significance**: This case highlights [discuss the broader implications of the case regarding employment law, workplace rights, or other relevant legal principles]. **Note**: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. --- Please fill in any specific details or adapt the summary as necessary based on the particulars of the case.

Thomas Zaborowski v. MHN Government Svcs


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available