Legal Case Summary

United States v. Andracos Marshall


Date Argued: Thu May 11 2017
Case Number: 16-4494
Docket Number: 6061342
Judges:G. Steven Agee, Barbara Milano Keenan, Pamela A. Harris
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Andracos Marshall, Docket Number 6061342** **Court:** United States District Court **Jurisdiction:** Federal **Docket Number:** 6061342 **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Andracos Marshall **Background:** Andracos Marshall was charged under federal law in relation to criminal activity that allegedly violated statutes regarding [specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, firearm possession, etc. – please insert relevant charges if known]. This case arose from an incident on [insert date], when federal agents or local law enforcement conducted an operation that led to Marshall’s arrest. The evidence against him included [briefly describe evidence such as physical evidence, eyewitness accounts, or surveillance footage]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case included the legality of the evidence obtained during the arrest, the interpretation of the relevant statutes, and any previous criminal history of the defendant that may influence sentencing. **Procedural History:** Marshall was arraigned in the district court following his arrest. He entered a plea of [guilty/not guilty] on [insert date]. The case proceeded through pre-trial motions, including motions to suppress evidence and other relevant filings. **Outcome:** On [insert date of decision], the court ruled on the pre-trial motions. Ultimately, the trial [concluded, resulted in a plea agreement, or was dismissed]. The jury [found the defendant guilty/not guilty] on [insert verdict details, if applicable]. Following this, the sentencing phase commenced, resulting in a sentence of [insert sentence details, e.g., number of years, fines, supervised release]. **Significance:** This case underscores [insert significance, such as the enforcement of federal laws in a specific domain, implications for future cases regarding evidence admissibility, etc.]. The outcome is reflective of the broader trends in [insert context, e.g., criminal justice, federal law enforcement]. **Conclusion:** United States v. Andracos Marshall serves as an important case in the realm of [specific area of law], highlighting the complexities involved in federal prosecutions and the judicial processes that govern them. Further developments are anticipated as the case may head into appeals or further legal proceedings. Please note: Additional specific details about charges, evidence, and legal implications may be needed to enhance this summary, depending on the specifics of the case.

United States v. Andracos Marshall


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available