Legal Case Summary

United States v. Armstrong Armstrong Davenp


Date Argued: Tue Jul 13 2004
Case Number: 03-35416
Docket Number: 7859562
Judges:Goodwin, W. Fletcher, Tallman
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Armstrong, Docket No. 7859562** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Filing/Decision] **Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Armstrong Davenp **Background:** The case concerns charges against the defendant, Armstrong Davenp, brought forth by the United States government. The specific nature of the charges relates to [insert brief details about the charges, e.g., drug trafficking, fraud, etc.]. **Facts:** - [Insert key facts of the case such as dates, locations, and context surrounding the offense]. - The government alleges that Davenp engaged in [specific activities leading to the charges]. - The prosecution presented evidence including [list types of evidence, such as documents, witness testimonies, recordings, etc.]. - The defense argued [insert key points made by the defense, such as lack of evidence, wrongful conduct by law enforcement, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issues include [insert key legal disputes, such as interpretation of law, admissibility of evidence, constitutional rights, etc.]. - The court was tasked with determining [insert the specific legal determinations needed, e.g., whether the evidence obtained was lawful, whether the defendant's rights were violated, etc.]. **Decision:** - The court ultimately ruled that [insert the court's decision, whether guilty or not guilty, any sanctions, recommendations for sentence, or dismissal of charges]. - The judge emphasized [insert emphasis from the court regarding the law, evidence, or framework used to arrive at the decision]. **Implications:** - This case sets a precedent for [discuss implications for future cases, impacts on law, or the community]. - The ruling highlights [insert any highlighted points about legal interpretation, enforcement practices, or civil rights]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Armstrong Davenp reflects the ongoing challenges in the realm of [insert relevant legal area such as criminal justice, drug policy, fraud enforcement, etc.]. It demonstrates the balancing act between law enforcement efforts and the rights of individuals in the judicial system. **Note:** [Any additional remarks or notes relevant to the case or future proceedings if applicable.] --- *Please fill in the placeholders with relevant information to complete the case summary.*

United States v. Armstrong Armstrong Davenp


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available