Legal Case Summary

United States v. AYON-CONTRERAS


Date Argued: Wed Apr 06 2005
Case Number: 04-50359
Docket Number: 7858321
Judges:T.G. Nelson, W. Fletcher, Bea
Duration: 26 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Ayon-Contreras** **Docket Number:** 7858321 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Judgment/Filings] **Background:** The case of United States v. Ayon-Contreras involves the defendant, Ayon-Contreras, who was charged with [insert specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, illegal re-entry, etc.]. The prosecution argued that Ayon-Contreras engaged in [briefly summarize the criminal activity, e.g., distributing narcotics, illegally crossing the border, etc.], which violated federal law. **Facts:** - The investigation leading to the arrest of Ayon-Contreras began on [insert date] when [insert relevant details about how the investigation started, e.g., law enforcement received a tip, monitored suspicious activity, etc.]. - Evidence presented during the trial included [list key evidence, such as witness testimony, seized items, surveillance footage, etc.]. - Ayon-Contreras was apprehended on [insert date of arrest] and subsequently charged with [list specific charges]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case included: 1. The admissibility of evidence collected during the investigation. 2. Whether Ayon-Contreras's rights were violated during the arrest and interrogation. 3. The interpretation of specific statutes related to the charges invoked by the prosecution. **Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of [the prosecution or defense], finding that [briefly summarize the court’s decision, including any significant legal reasoning or interpretations that were pivotal in the ruling]. **Sentencing:** If found guilty, Ayon-Contreras faced a sentence of [insert sentencing outcome, e.g., several years of imprisonment, fines, etc.]. The judge considered [mention any relevant factors that influenced the sentencing, such as prior criminal history, cooperation with authorities, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Ayon-Contreras is significant for its implications on [discuss any broader legal or social implications arising from the case, such as the handling of immigration matters, drug-related offenses, or civil rights concerns]. **Note:** For specific dates, further details regarding the charges, rulings, and facts, please refer to case documents or court records.

United States v. AYON-CONTRERAS


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available