Legal Case Summary

United States v. Briceton Grant


Date Argued: Tue May 09 2017
Case Number: 16-4258
Docket Number: 6060401
Judges:Diana Gribbon Motz, Dennis W. Shedd, Allyson K. Duncan
Duration: 41 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Briceton Grant** **Docket Number:** 6060401 **Court:** [Insert Court Name, if known] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision or Filing, if known] **Background:** Briceton Grant was charged with [insert specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, possession with intent to distribute, etc.]. The case was brought before the court following an investigation that revealed [insert key facts leading to the charges, such as surveillance, informant tips, or discoveries during a lawful search]. **Facts of the Case:** 1. On [insert date], law enforcement officials conducted [insert details of the operation, such as a search warrant execution or surveillance], leading to the discovery of [insert evidence found, e.g., illegal substances, firearms, etc.]. 2. Grant was alleged to have [insert Grant's alleged actions, e.g., distributed, possessed, or manufactured narcotics], which were in violation of [insert federal statute or law]. 3. Subsequently, Grant was arrested and charged [insert specific details about the charges]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case included [insert legal debates, such as the legality of evidence obtained, the sufficiency of the evidence, or constitutional rights involved]. Additionally, the prosecution needed to prove [insert burden of proof or specific elements of the offense]. **Court’s Analysis:** 1. The court examined [insert key legal precedents or statutes relevant to the case]. 2. The evidence presented by the prosecution included [summarize the type of evidence, e.g., witness testimonies, physical evidence, surveillance footage]. 3. The defense argued [insert defense arguments, such as lack of evidence, unlawful search and seizure, issues relating to the validity of confessions, etc.]. **Ruling:** The court ultimately ruled [insert the decision of the court, e.g., guilty, not guilty, dismissal of charges]. The ruling emphasized [insert important points from the judge's opinion or the rationale behind the decision]. **Conclusion/Outcome:** Briceton Grant was [insert the outcome, e.g., sentenced to a specific term, acquitted, or appealed the decision]. The implications of this case could influence [insert potential impacts, such as future cases, changes in law enforcement practices, etc.]. **Significance:** This case serves as a significant example of [insert broader implications in legal context or how it might affect future legal scenarios]. (Note: This summary is fictional and intended for illustrative purposes. Please verify details for accuracy if needed.)

United States v. Briceton Grant


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available