Legal Case Summary

United States v. Carly Ahlstrom


Date Argued: Thu May 16 2013
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2600830
Judges:William B. Traxler Jr., Stephanie D. Thacker, Ellen L. Hollander
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Carly Ahlstrom** **Docket Number:** 2600830 **Court:** [Specific court name, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Date of the decision or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Carly Ahlstrom **Background:** Carly Ahlstrom was charged with [specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, fraud, etc.]. The case arose from events that occurred on [specific dates or time period], where Ahlstrom was alleged to be involved in [brief description of the criminal activity]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case included [issues such as the interpretation of specific laws, constitutional rights, evidentiary matters, etc.]. The defense raised arguments pertaining to [specific defenses or legal doctrines]. **Court Proceedings:** The proceedings included [mention any key hearings, motions filed, etc.]. Ahlstrom’s defense team argued that [brief summary of the defense's arguments]. The prosecution presented evidence including [specific types of evidence, e.g., witness testimonies, documents, etc.], asserting that Ahlstrom engaged in criminal conduct that warranted prosecution. **Outcome:** On [date of the ruling], the court issued a decision regarding [outcome, e.g., conviction, acquittal, plea agreement]. The judge cited [reasoning or legal standards applied] in the decision-making process. **Implications:** The case's outcome could have implications for [discuss broader implications or legal precedents that may arise from the case]. The ruling may influence future cases involving [related charges or issues]. **Conclusion:** The United States v. Carly Ahlstrom case illustrates [summarize its significance, such as the importance of legal standards, the application of law, or novel interpretations]. The decision contributes to [the body of law or policy area impacted]. **Note:** This case summary is a general overview and may lack specific details. Please refer to the actual court documents or legal reports for comprehensive information.

United States v. Carly Ahlstrom


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available