Case Summary
**Case Summary: United States v. Catalino Pineda**
**Docket Number:** 7839949
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Date of ruling]
**Overview:**
This case involves defendant Catalino Pineda, who was charged with [specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, possession of illegal firearms, etc.]. The details of the case revolve around [briefly describe the circumstances leading to the charges, including key events, dates, or locations relevant to the case].
**Factual Background:**
Catalino Pineda was apprehended following an investigation initiated by [law enforcement agency], which focused on suspected illegal activities in [specific location]. Evidence collected during the investigation included [describe types of evidence, such as surveillance footage, witness testimony, seized contraband, etc.].
On [specific date], law enforcement executed a search warrant at [location]. During this operation, officers discovered [list items seized and their significance]. Pineda was subsequently arrested and charged.
**Legal Proceedings:**
The case was brought before the court, where several pre-trial motions were filed, including [any notable motions, such as suppression of evidence, change of venue, etc.]. The court ruled on these motions, which shaped the course of the trial.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Admissibility of Evidence:** A primary focus was the legality of the search warrant and the subsequent evidence obtained during the search.
2. **Credibility of Witnesses:** Testimony from various witnesses was critical in establishing Pineda's involvement in the alleged activities.
**Outcome:**
After [briefly describe trial proceedings, number of days, jury deliberation, etc.], the jury reached a verdict on [verdict date]. Catalino Pineda was found [guilty/not guilty] on [specify charges].
**Sentencing:**
If applicable, the court imposed a sentence of [details of sentencing, including length and type of sentence, any fines, or probation terms].
**Significance:**
This case serves as a notable example of [discuss any legal precedents set, implications for future cases, or broader societal impacts]. Legal professionals and law enforcement agencies may reference this case in discussions regarding [relevant legal principles or issues].
**Conclusion:**
The United States v. Catalino Pineda underscores the complexities involved in [specific aspect of law], and the proceedings highlighted the balance between law enforcement practices and defendants' rights.
---
Note: Please fill in the placeholders with specific details of the case once they are available, as this summary is based on a generic template without access to actual case details.