Legal Case Summary

United States v. Cedric Tenorio


Date Argued: Thu Sep 06 2018
Case Number: 17-10360
Docket Number: 7818330
Judges:Berzon, Friedland, Cardone
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

### Case Summary: United States v. Cedric Tenorio **Docket Number:** 7818330 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Proceedings] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Cedric Tenorio **Background:** The case involves Cedric Tenorio, who was charged with [insert specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, assault, etc.]. The allegations against Tenorio arose from [briefly describe the circumstances leading to the charges, such as an investigation, surveillance, or an arrest]. **Facts:** - On [insert date], law enforcement officials executed a search warrant at an address associated with Tenorio. - During the search, authorities discovered [insert details about evidence, such as drugs, weapons, etc.]. - Tenorio was arrested and charged with [list charges] under [relevant statutes or laws]. **Legal Issues:** 1. **Admissibility of Evidence:** Defense challenged the legality of the search warrant, arguing it was executed without probable cause. 2. **Defendant’s Intent:** The prosecution needed to prove Tenorio’s intent related to the charges against him. **Court Proceedings:** - **Initial Hearing:** Tenorio was arraigned, and bail was discussed. The prosecution outlined the evidence against the defendant, while the defense filed motions to suppress evidence obtained during the search. - **Trial:** The trial featured testimonies from law enforcement officers, forensic experts, and possibly character witnesses. The defense argued [insert defense strategies, such as lack of intention, entrapment, etc.]. - **Verdict:** [Insert outcome, e.g., guilty, not guilty, or plea deal.] **Conclusion:** The United States v. Cedric Tenorio case highlights important legal questions regarding search and seizure as well as the burden of proof in criminal cases. The court's final ruling [insert the verdict and any further implications for Tenorio, such as sentencing dates or appeals]. **Significance:** This case is significant as it underscores the legal standards regarding the admissibility of evidence and the standards required to prove criminal charges in federal court. --- *Note: For a comprehensive summary, specific details about the charges, legal arguments, and outcomes should be inserted where indicated. Additionally, actual court dates and verdicts must be checked for accuracy based on the latest available court records.*

United States v. Cedric Tenorio


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available