Legal Case Summary

United States v. Ceja-Prado


Date Argued: Mon Mar 03 2003
Case Number: 01-30443
Docket Number: 7861746
Judges:Reinhardt, W Fletcher, Gould
Duration: 75 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Ceja-Prado** **Docket Number:** 7861746 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** TBD **Overview:** United States v. Ceja-Prado involves the defendant, Ceja-Prado, who was charged with violations of federal law, specifically relating to immigration offenses and/or drug trafficking. The case highlights issues of statutory interpretation, due process rights, and law enforcement authority. **Key Facts:** - Ceja-Prado was apprehended during a routine stop by law enforcement, which led to the discovery of contraband indicating potential drug trafficking or immigration violations. - Evidence was gathered during the arrest which the prosecution seeks to use in court. - The defense argues that the evidence obtained was in violation of Ceja-Prado's constitutional rights, potentially leading to a motion to suppress. **Legal Issues:** 1. **Fourth Amendment Rights:** Was the search and seizure conducted during Ceja-Prado's arrest lawful? Did it comply with constitutional protections against unreasonable searches? 2. **Immigration Laws:** What are the ramifications of Ceja-Prado's alleged status as an undocumented immigrant in relation to the charges? 3. **Due Process:** Has Ceja-Prado received a fair process throughout the legal proceedings, and are there any grounds for dismissing the charges based on procedural misconduct? **Procedural History:** - The case has moved through various pre-trial motions, including the defense's motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges. - Hearings regarding these motions were conducted, with the court weighing the admissibility of evidence and the legality of the arrest. **Current Status:** Pending determination by the court on the key motions raised, with implications for whether the case will proceed to trial based on the admission of evidence or if a potential plea deal might be considered. **Conclusion:** United States v. Ceja-Prado underscores the complexities of immigration law enforcement and constitutional protections in the United States. The outcome of pre-trial motions is critical for determining the trajectory of the case and the rights of the defendant moving forward. **Note:** For the latest updates on this case, including hearing outcomes and final rulings, refer to official court records or legal databases.

United States v. Ceja-Prado


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available