Legal Case Summary

United States v. David Frazier


Date Argued: Thu Mar 12 2009
Case Number: 08-30252
Docket Number: 7850486
Judges:Fletcher, Gould, Tallman
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. David Frazier** **Docket Number:** 7850486 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** David Frazier **Case Background:** David Frazier was charged with [describe the specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, theft, fraud], stemming from an incident that occurred on [insert date of incident]. The prosecution alleged that Frazier engaged in activities that violated federal laws, thus warranting federal intervention. **Key Facts:** - On [insert date], law enforcement conducted an investigation based on [insert reason for investigation, such as surveillance, tip-offs, etc.]. - Evidence was gathered, including [list types of evidence, e.g., physical evidence, witness testimonies, electronic records]. - Frazier was arrested on [insert date of arrest], whereupon he was charged with [list specific charges]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues at stake included: - Whether the evidence collected against Frazier was obtained lawfully. - Determinations regarding the admissibility of certain pieces of evidence. - The sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges. **Proceedings:** - The initial hearings occurred on [insert dates], where Frazier entered a plea of [guilty/not guilty]. - Pre-trial motions were filed by the defense regarding [insert issues such as suppression of evidence, dismissal of charges, etc.]. **Trial:** - The trial commenced on [insert date]. The prosecution presented its case, calling witnesses and introducing evidence to support its claims. - The defense countered with [insert defense strategy, e.g., alibi, lack of intent, mistaken identity]. **Outcome:** - The jury returned a verdict of [guilty/not guilty] on [insert date]. - Following the verdict, sentencing was scheduled for [insert date], during which the court considered factors such as [insert any factors, such as prior conviction history, severity of the crime, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. David Frazier highlights key issues in the federal legal system regarding [insert relevant legal principles, such as criminal procedure, evidentiary standards, etc.]. The proceedings reflected the complexities of handling federal cases, especially concerning [insert specific note, such as the balance of prosecution and defense, rights of the accused, etc.]. **Note:** For detailed legal analysis and implications of the case, further examination of court records and legal opinions following the case's conclusion is recommended.

United States v. David Frazier


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available