Legal Case Summary

United States v. Eliseo Domingues-Chalpeno


Date Argued: Wed Oct 09 2013
Case Number: 12-30269
Docket Number: 7837217
Judges:Silverman, Fletcher, Callahan
Duration: 27 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

Case Summary: United States v. Eliseo Domingues-Chalpeno Docket Number: 7837217 Court: [Insert Court Name] Date: [Insert Date of Decision] Facts: Eliseo Domingues-Chalpeno was charged in the United States District Court with violations related to [specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, illegal entry, etc.]. The case arose from an incident on [insert date], where law enforcement authorities conducted an investigation that led to the defendant's arrest. Evidence presented included [briefly describe key evidence, such as seized drugs, testimony, or surveillance footage]. Legal Issues: The primary legal issues in this case revolved around [insert key legal issues, such as the legality of the search and seizure, the sufficiency of evidence, issues of jurisdiction, or rights violations]. The defense argued that [insert defense arguments], whereas the prosecution maintained that [insert prosecution's arguments]. Procedural History: After the arrest, Domingues-Chalpeno was brought before the court and initially entered a plea of [insert plea, e.g., guilty, not guilty]. Pretrial motions were filed, including [briefly describe any significant pretrial motions, such as a motion to suppress evidence]. The court's rulings on these motions had a substantial impact on the direction of the case. Ruling: The court ultimately [insert the ruling of the court, including any findings of fact and conclusions of law]. In its decision, the court held that [summarize the court's reasoning and any precedents cited]. The ruling addressed the legal questions presented and assessed the evidence, resulting in a determination regarding the defendant's guilt or innocence. Outcome: Eliseo Domingues-Chalpeno was [convicted/acquitted] on [insert date]. The court sentenced him to [insert sentence, if applicable, such as time served, probation, fines, etc.], taking into consideration [mention any mitigating or aggravating factors considered during sentencing]. The case highlighted [insert any broader implications or notable aspects of the case, such as issues related to enforcement policies, sentencing trends, or impacts on communities]. Note: Details such as court name, dates, specific charges, and outcomes should be filled in based on the specific facts and information related to the case, as they may not be publicly available or might vary.

United States v. Eliseo Domingues-Chalpeno


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available