Case Summary
**Case Summary: United States v. Fernando Armenta-Romero**
**Docket Number:** 3071680
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling]
**Overview:**
The case of United States v. Fernando Armenta-Romero revolves around charges brought against Armenta-Romero for violations related to immigration laws. The case highlights legal issues concerning unlawful entry, deportation proceedings, and the rights of individuals under U.S. law.
**Facts:**
Fernando Armenta-Romero was apprehended by law enforcement authorities for entering the United States without proper documentation. The government alleged that Armenta-Romero had previously been deported from the U.S. and had re-entered illegally.
**Legal Issues:**
The core legal issues in this case included:
1. Whether Armenta-Romero was guilty of unlawful re-entry after prior deportation.
2. The application of relevant statutes concerning immigration violations, particularly under Title 8 of the U.S. Code.
3. Any potential defenses Armenta-Romero could raise regarding his entry and subsequent arrest.
**Proceedings:**
Following the apprehension, Armenta-Romero was charged with unlawful re-entry of a removed alien. The court proceedings included preliminary hearings, discussions of evidence including Armenta-Romero’s prior deportation order, and considerations regarding his intent and knowledge of his illegal status upon re-entry.
**Decision:**
The court ultimately found Armenta-Romero guilty of unlawful re-entry. The ruling was based on the evidence presented, which included his deportation record and testimony regarding his illegal entry. The court detailed the legal standards applicable to re-entry cases and reaffirmed the government’s authority to enforce immigration laws.
**Sentencing:**
At sentencing, the court imposed a term of imprisonment consistent with the statutory guidelines for unlawful re-entry, along with serving any additional terms related to prior offenses. The decision underscored the court’s position on the seriousness of immigration violations.
**Conclusion:**
The case of United States v. Fernando Armenta-Romero serves as a significant example of the federal government's approach to immigration enforcement. It illustrates the complexities involved in immigration law and the legal processes surrounding unlawful entry and deportation. The case emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal statutes and the consequences faced by individuals who violate them.
**Note:** Specific dates and detailed legal references might be added based on actual case records for thoroughness.