Legal Case Summary

United States v. Francisco Lizarraga-Espinoza


Date Argued: Thu Jun 05 2014
Case Number: 01-13-00868-CV
Docket Number: 2606156
Judges:REINHARDT, FISHER, MURGUIA
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Francisco Lizarraga-Espinoza** **Docket Number:** 2606156 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling] **Presiding Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name] **Background:** Francisco Lizarraga-Espinoza was charged in connection with violations of federal immigration laws. The case revolved around allegations that Lizarraga-Espinoza illegally re-entered the United States after being previously deported. This case highlights complex issues related to immigration enforcement and the legal ramifications of unlawful re-entry. **Facts:** 1. Francisco Lizarraga-Espinoza had previously been deported from the United States on [insert date]. 2. Following his deportation, he unlawfully re-entered the United States on or around [insert date of re-entry]. 3. Federal authorities apprehended him during a routine inspection/check or as a result of a specific investigation. 4. Upon apprehension, it was determined that Lizarraga-Espinoza had a history of immigration violations, which led to the current charges. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issue in this case is the violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which pertains to the unlawful re-entry of an alien who has been previously deported. The government must prove that: - The defendant was an alien. - The defendant had been deported. - The defendant re-entered the United States without authorization. - The defendant knew of the deportation and illegal status upon re-entry. **Proceedings:** - Lizarraga-Espinoza was arraigned on the charges and pled [insert plea, e.g., guilty/not guilty]. - The court conducted hearings to assess the evidence presented by the prosecution, including past deportation records and evidence of illegal re-entry. - The defense may have raised arguments regarding [insert key defense arguments, e.g., challenges to the deportation order, claims of due process violations, etc.]. **Ruling:** [Insert the court’s decision, e.g., guilty, not guilty, dismissed, etc. Discuss any sentencing rulings or special considerations given by the judge.] **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Francisco Lizarraga-Espinoza serves as an important example of the legal consequences of unauthorized re-entry into the United States. The case underscores the complexities of immigration law and its enforcement, as well as the judicial processes involved in handling violations of such laws. **Note:** Specific details such as hearing dates, plea specifics, and other case particulars should be filled in as applicable, based on the actual proceedings and rulings in this case.

United States v. Francisco Lizarraga-Espinoza


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available