Legal Case Summary

United States v. Freddie Hankins


Date Argued: Thu Aug 15 2013
Case Number: 12-30352
Docket Number: 7837407
Judges:Kozinski, Berzon, Ikuta
Duration: 19 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Freddie Hankins** **Docket Number:** 7837407 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision or any relevant dates] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Freddie Hankins **Background:** Freddie Hankins was charged in connection with [briefly describe the nature of the charges, e.g., drug trafficking, firearms offenses, fraud, etc.]. The case arose from an investigation by federal law enforcement agencies that indicated Hankins was involved in [provide details about the criminal activity and any relevant context]. **Charges:** Hankins faced multiple counts, including: 1. [List specific charges, e.g., possession with intent to distribute, conspiracy to commit a crime, etc.] 2. [Additional charges if applicable] **Proceedings:** The case proceeded through [describe the stages of the case, such as arraignment, pre-trial motions, plea negotiations, and trial]. Hankins pleaded [guilty/not guilty], and the case was set for trial/[plea agreement was reached]. **Legal Issues:** Key legal issues in the case included: - [Issue 1: E.g., admissibility of evidence] - [Issue 2: E.g., conduct of law enforcement during the investigation] - [Issue 3: E.g., interpretation of relevant statutes] **Outcome:** On [date], the court rendered its decision. Hankins was [found guilty/not guilty], and the court imposed a sentence of [specify the sentence, e.g., prison time, fines, probation]. Factors influencing the sentence included [considerations such as criminal history, cooperation with law enforcement, or severity of the offense]. **Impact:** The ruling in United States v. Freddie Hankins serves as a precedent for [explain any legal implications or significance, if applicable]. It highlights [discuss any broader legal principles or issues addressed in the case]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Freddie Hankins illustrates the federal government's commitment to prosecuting [type of crime] and underscores the judicial system's role in adjudicating serious offenses against federal law. Further developments in the case may involve [mention any potential appeals or further motions by the defendant]. *Note: This case summary is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only, as there may not be actual records of a case with this specific docket number.*

United States v. Freddie Hankins


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available