Legal Case Summary

United States v. Gary Span


Date Argued: Wed Apr 08 2015
Case Number: 32020-1
Docket Number: 2648041
Judges:Diana Gribbon Motz, Roger L. Gregory, Andre M. Davis
Duration: 48 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Gary Span** **Docket Number:** 2648041 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert relevant dates if available] ### Parties Involved: - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Gary Span ### Background: The case involves criminal charges against Gary Span, who was accused of [insert specific charges—e.g., drug trafficking, firearms violations, etc.]. The allegations stem from events that occurred on or around [insert specific dates or timeline relevant to the case]. ### Key Facts: 1. **Incident Overview:** On [insert relevant date], law enforcement conducted an investigation that led to the arrest of Gary Span. The investigation revealed [briefly describe what evidence was found or what actions were taken, e.g., possession of illegal substances, firearms]. 2. **Evidence Presented:** The prosecution presented evidence including [list evidence such as physical items, witness testimonies, surveillance footage, etc.] which allegedly linked Span to the criminal activity. 3. **Defense Position:** Gary Span’s defense argued [insert key arguments made by the defense, such as lack of evidence, unlawful search and seizure, mistaken identity, etc.]. ### Legal Issues: The case raised significant legal issues regarding [list any notable legal questions or precedents, such as Fourth Amendment rights, sufficiency of evidence, jury instructions, etc.]. ### Court’s Decision: After considering the evidence and arguments presented, the court [describe the ruling—e.g., convicted, acquitted, sentenced to a specific penalty, etc.]. The judge emphasized [mention any important statements made by the judge regarding the rationale behind the ruling]. ### Conclusion: The outcome of United States v. Gary Span has implications for [discuss any broader implications, such as changes in legal interpretations, impacts on law enforcement practices, etc.]. The case has garnered attention due to its significance in the ongoing discussions about [mention related legal issues or societal topics]. ### Next Steps: Following the verdict, [insert any relevant follow-up actions, such as appeals, sentencing dates, or further legal proceedings]. --- *Note: Specific details, dates, and outcomes should be inserted as applicable to the case.*

United States v. Gary Span


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available