Legal Case Summary

United States v. Jose Segundo-Orellana


Date Argued: Mon Sep 09 2013
Case Number: 12-10186
Docket Number: 7837335
Judges:Battaglia, Schroeder, Bybee
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Jose Segundo-Orellana** **Docket Number:** 7837335 **Court:** [Specific Court Name, if available, e.g., U.S. District Court] **Date:** [Specific Date, if available] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Jose Segundo-Orellana **Background:** Jose Segundo-Orellana was charged with [describe the specific charges, e.g., immigration violations, drug trafficking, etc.]. The case stemmed from an investigation conducted by [describe the agency, e.g., Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DEA] that led to the apprehension of Segundo-Orellana on [date of arrest]. **Facts:** - The defendant was alleged to have [outline key factual allegations, such as actions leading to the charges]. - Evidence presented included [mention types of evidence, e.g., witness testimonies, surveillance footage, physical evidence]. - Segundo-Orellana's defense argued [summarize the defense's position]. **Procedural History:** The case was brought before the court following [describe any preliminary hearings or motions]. Subsequent proceedings included [mention any plea deals, hearings, or significant rulings]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case included: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., the legality of the search and seizure] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., admissibility of evidence] 3. [Issue 3: e.g., application of specific federal statutes] **Decision:** The court ruled [summarize the court’s decision or verdict]. Consequently, the defendant was [state the outcome, e.g., convicted, acquitted, sentenced to a specific term, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Jose Segundo-Orellana highlights significant issues related to [mention the broader implications or themes of the case, such as immigration policy, drug enforcement practices, etc.]. The ruling reflects the court's stance on [summarize the legal precedent or implications of the decision]. **Notes:** Further legal ramifications or appeals may follow, and the case may set a precedent for similar future cases within the jurisdiction. [End of Summary] **Disclaimer:** This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please refer to official court documents for the most accurate and detailed information.

United States v. Jose Segundo-Orellana


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available