Legal Case Summary

United States v. Kevin Harpham


Date Argued: Tue Mar 04 2014
Case Number: 12-30063
Docket Number: 7836527
Judges:Goodwin, Trott, Fletcher
Duration: 39 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Kevin Harpham** **Docket Number:** 7836527 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert relevant date or dates, e.g., indictment, trial, sentencing] **Background:** Kevin Harpham was charged with federal crimes related to his involvement in a plot that threatened the safety of a public event. The case arose from his actions surrounding the 2011 Spokesman-Review Annual Martin Luther King Jr. Day Celebration in Spokane, Washington. **Charges:** Harpham faced multiple charges, including: - Possession of a prohibited weapon (a homemade bomb). - Use of a weapon of mass destruction in an attempt to damage or destroy property. - Additional charges may pertain to civil rights violations or conspiratorial activities relating to hate or extremist movements. **Facts:** In January 2011, law enforcement discovered a bomb near the location of the celebration. Further investigation linked Harpham to the bomb's construction and placement. Evidence included the collection of materials used for the device, video surveillance, and Harpham's online activities, which suggested a motive rooted in extremist beliefs. **Legal Proceedings:** Harpham was arrested following the discovery of the bomb, and he subsequently entered a plea. The case garnered media attention due to its implications for public safety and civil rights. The prosecution emphasized the seriousness of the offenses and the potential threat to the community. **Outcome:** The outcome of the case involved a conviction on the major charges against Harpham. He was sentenced to a significant prison term. The court's decision highlighted the importance of addressing domestic terrorism and protecting civil rights. **Conclusion:** The United States v. Kevin Harpham serves as a notable example of federal action against individuals posing threats to public safety through extremist actions. The case underscores the commitment of law enforcement and the judiciary to uphold the rule of law while safeguarding communities from acts of violence and hatred. (Note: Be sure to insert actual dates and outcomes based on official court documents or legal archives, as some information may be hypothetical or illustrative.)

United States v. Kevin Harpham


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available