Legal Case Summary

United States v. King


Date Argued: Mon Oct 16 2006
Case Number: 05-10629
Docket Number: 7855841
Judges:Bezzer, O'scannlain, Trott
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. King** **Docket Number:** 7855841 **Court:** [Specify the court, if known, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision or relevant proceedings, if known] ### Background: In the case of United States v. King, the defendant, [Defendant’s Full Name], was charged with [briefly describe the charges, e.g., criminal offenses such as drug trafficking, firearm possession, etc.]. The case arose from [describe key facts leading to charges, such as police investigation, evidence collected, etc.]. ### Key Facts: - The incident took place on [specify date]. - [Briefly summarize the events that led to the arrest, evidence involved, etc.]. - The government argued that [provide an overview of the prosecution's argument]. - The defense contended that [outline the defense's position or arguments]. ### Legal Issues: 1. **[Issue 1]:** [Describe the first legal issue or question the court had to decide, e.g., legality of evidence obtained, constitutionality of a law, etc.] 2. **[Issue 2]:** [Outline any additional legal issues pertinent to the case.] ### Court Findings: - After reviewing the evidence and arguments presented, the court [specify the court's ruling on the key issues]. - The court found that [summarize the reasoning behind the decision]. - [Mention any relevant case law or precedents that influenced the ruling]. ### Outcome: - The verdict rendered by the court was [guilty/not guilty]. - [Discuss any sentencing or penalties imposed, if applicable]. - The court also addressed [any additional orders, such as restitution, probation, etc.]. ### Appeals: - [If applicable, specify whether either party filed an appeal and the grounds for the appeal.] ### Significance: This case highlights [discuss the broader implications, such as legal precedents, changes in law enforcement practices, or interpretations of constitutional rights]. --- **Note:** The specific details, such as names, dates, and legal arguments, should be filled in based on actual case information, as the particulars were not available in the query.

United States v. King


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available


https://www.courtlistener.com/" target="_blank">Courtlister rtlister