Legal Case Summary

United States v. Martin Barcenas-Yanez


Date Argued: Wed May 11 2016
Case Number: 15-4363
Docket Number: 3063371
Judges:Diana Gribbon Motz, Henry F. Floyd, Andre M. Davis
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Martin Barcenas-Yanez, Docket Number 3063371** **Court:** [Specify Court] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Citation:** [Specify Citation if available] **Overview:** This case involves the defendant, Martin Barcenas-Yanez, who was charged with [specific charges, e.g., illegal re-entry into the United States, drug trafficking, etc.], stemming from [briefly describe the facts leading to the charge, e.g., prior deportation, illegal entry, involvement in drug activities, etc.]. **Background:** Martin Barcenas-Yanez, a citizen of [Country of Origin], had previously been deported from the United States on [date of deportation]. After his deportation, he allegedly re-entered the country without proper authorization. The government discovered his presence through [specific evidence, such as law enforcement encounters, surveillance, etc.]. **Legal Proceedings:** The case was brought before the [Specify Court] on [date]. The defendant faced charges related to [specify the charges, e.g., 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for illegal re-entry after removal, etc.]. During the proceedings, the defense argued [outline the defense’s position, such as lack of knowledge of re-entry laws or challenges to the legality of prior deportation proceedings]. **Outcome:** The court [describe the court's decision, whether the defendant was found guilty or not guilty, and any sentences imposed, such as imprisonment, fines, or deportation]. The judge emphasized [any key points made by the judge during sentencing or concluding remarks regarding the case]. **Significance:** This case highlights [briefly touch on the broader implications, such as enforcement of immigration laws, legal challenges in deportation cases, or principles related to due process]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Martin Barcenas-Yanez serves as an important example of [summarize the key takeaway]. The legal principles established and the outcomes reached in this case will continue to influence [mention relevant legal or social contexts]. **Note:** The specifics of this case should be supplemented with actual court documents or records for precise legal analysis and commentary.

United States v. Martin Barcenas-Yanez


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available