Legal Case Summary

United States v. Nina Manning


Date Argued: Wed Nov 19 2008
Case Number: 08-10102
Docket Number: 7851159
Judges:Schroeder, Paez, Smith
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Nina Manning, Docket No. 7851159** **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Court Proceedings] **Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name] **Background:** Nina Manning was charged in relation to [insert brief description of the charges, e.g., drug trafficking, fraud, etc.]. The case arose from an investigation by federal authorities into her alleged involvement in [insert details of the criminal activities]. The investigation culminated in her arrest on [insert arrest date], leading to the indictment filed under Docket No. 7851159. **Legal Issues:** 1. The primary charge against Manning includes [insert the primary charge, e.g., conspiracy to distribute narcotics]. 2. Legal arguments centered on [insert any notable motions or legal arguments raised by defense, prosecution, or related to evidence]. **Proceedings:** During the pre-trial phase, Mannings' defense moved to [insert any motions filed, such as dismissing charges, suppressing evidence]. The prosecution countered with [insert any opposing arguments]. The court [insert a brief description of the judge’s decisions on these motions]. At trial, the prosecution presented evidence including [insert types of evidence presented, such as witness testimonies, documents, surveillance footage]. Manning's defense argued [insert key points of the defense argument]. **Outcome:** The jury [insert whether the jury found Manning guilty or not guilty]. The court subsequently [insert any sentencing details if applicable, such as length of imprisonment, fines, or probation]. **Significance:** This case highlighted issues pertaining to [insert any legal precedents set, implications for federal law enforcement practices, or wider social implications]. It serves as a notable example of [insert any relevant observations about the case or its impact on similar cases]. **Conclusion:** United States v. Nina Manning is a significant case that reflects [insert final thoughts on the case, its implications, and its relevance in legal discourse]. --- *Please note that specific dates, judge's names, and other factual details should be inserted as applicable to the case.*

United States v. Nina Manning


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available