Legal Case Summary

United States v. Nosal


Date Argued: Mon Feb 14 2011
Case Number: 10-10038
Docket Number: 7846324
Judges:O'scannlain, Trott, Cjj Campbell (Utah), Dj
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Nosal (Docket Number: 7846324)** **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit **Date:** The case was decided in 2012. **Overview:** United States v. Nosal centers around the interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), specifically concerning unauthorized access to computers and the implications of employee access. **Facts:** David Nosal, a former employee of Korn/Ferry International, used his former access credentials to log into his ex-employer's computer systems after his departure. He did this to obtain confidential information, which he used to aid a competing firm. Korn/Ferry International discovered the unauthorized access and reported it to the authorities. **Legal Issue:** The primary legal question concerned whether Nosal's actions constituted "exceeding authorized access" under the CFAA. The statute defines unauthorized access but does not clearly delineate the limits of what constitutes exceeding authority in the workplace context. **Court's Ruling:** The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Nosal did not exceed authorized access under the CFAA. The Court held that while Nosal was not authorized to use the company’s system for competitive purposes, he had proper access as a former employee to log in to the system. Thus, his actions did not meet the threshold of "exceeding authorized access" as intended by the CFAA. **Significance:** This ruling brought attention to the limitations of the CFAA concerning employee access and what constitutes unauthorized usage. The decision underscored the need for clarity within the statute and set a precedent for how workplace access rights are interpreted under federal law. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Nosal underscores the challenges in interpreting the CFAA in an era of rapidly evolving technology and employment practices. It demonstrates the complexities involved in defining unauthorized access and highlights the necessity for precise legislative language to address contemporary issues of computer and information security.

United States v. Nosal


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available