Legal Case Summary

United States v. Ogles


Date Argued: Wed Dec 14 2005
Case Number: 03-10439
Docket Number: 7857050
Judges:Schroeder, Pregerson, Reinhardt, Kleinfeld, Hawkins, Graber, McKeown, W. Fletcher, Fisher, Gould, Berzon
Duration: 68 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Ogles (Docket Number: 7857050)** **Court:** United States District Court **Case Number:** 7857050 **Date of Ruling:** [Insert Date Here] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** Ogles **Background:** This case involves the prosecution of Ogles for charges related to [Insert specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, possession of illegal firearms, etc.]. The events leading up to the case stemmed from [provide a brief context regarding the incident or investigation that led to the charges, such as the arrest, search warrants, or previously collected evidence]. **Facts:** 1. Law enforcement received information regarding Ogles' alleged involvement in [specify illegal activities]. 2. Following an investigation, authorities conducted a search of Ogles' premises on [insert date]. During the search, they uncovered [detail any significant evidence found, e.g., illegal substances, weapons, financial documents]. 3. Ogles was subsequently arrested and charged with [list the specific charges]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: - Whether the evidence obtained during the search was admissible in court. - The legality of the search warrant obtained by law enforcement. - The adequacy of the prosecution's evidence connecting Ogles to the alleged crimes. **Court Findings:** The court examined the lawfulness of the search warrant and the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the prosecution. Key findings included: - The search warrant was deemed valid based on probable cause established by credible sources. - The evidence collected from Ogles' property was ruled admissible in court. - The prosecution was able to establish a clear link between Ogles and the criminal activities for which he was charged. **Conclusion:** The court ultimately found Ogles [insert verdict, e.g., guilty, not guilty, guilty on certain counts but not others]. In sentencing, the judge considered factors such as [discuss any mitigating or aggravating circumstances discussed during sentencing]. This case sets a precedent regarding [mention any legal principles upheld or clarified as a result of the case]. **Note:** Further details regarding sentencing outcomes, appeals, or subsequent legal actions may be available depending on the case's developments after the ruling. --- Please ensure to fill in the specific details regarding charges and dates, as well as exact findings, depending on the actual contents of the case.

United States v. Ogles


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available