Case Summary
**Case Summary: United States v. Paris Starwalt**
**Docket Number:** 6:16-cr-00303
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Insert relevant date, e.g., date of judgment]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** United States of America
- **Defendant:** Paris Starwalt
**Background:**
Paris Starwalt was charged with multiple offenses, including but not limited to, violations related to illegal possession and distribution of controlled substances. The case arose from investigations that indicated Starwalt was involved in the trafficking of narcotics within the jurisdiction.
**Charges:**
The specific charges against Starwalt included:
- Possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute
- Distribution of a controlled substance
- Relevant firearm charges (if applicable)
**Procedural History:**
- The case was initiated following an investigation by law enforcement agencies, leading to the arrest of Starwalt.
- Indictment was filed, and Starwalt entered a plea.
- Pre-trial motions were submitted by both parties, addressing evidentiary issues and motions to suppress certain evidence obtained during the investigation.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Admissibility of Evidence:** The defense challenged the admissibility of certain evidence collected during the investigation, arguing potential violations of the Fourth Amendment.
2. **Intent to Distribute:** The prosecution aimed to demonstrate Starwalt’s intent to distribute controlled substances based on the quantity of drugs found and related evidence.
**Decision:**
The court ruled on the admissibility of evidence based on the Fourth Amendment concerns raised by the defense, which were evaluated through a series of hearings. Ultimately, the court found that the evidence was admissible.
**Outcome:**
Paris Starwalt was convicted on the charges related to possession and distribution of controlled substances. The court considered various factors, including the nature of the offense, prior criminal history, and the impact of drug trafficking on the community, before determining the sentence.
**Sentencing:**
Starwalt was sentenced to [Insert sentence details, e.g., years of imprisonment, fines, probation terms] based on the findings of the case.
**Impact:**
This case exemplified the ongoing efforts of law enforcement to target drug trafficking operations and highlighted significant legal issues related to evidence gathering and the constitutional rights of defendants.
**Note:**
For more detailed and specific information, including actual testimonies, rulings, and legal reasoning, refer to the full court documents and opinions related to the case.