Case Summary
**Case Summary: United States v. Quentin Perry**
**Docket Number:** 7152388
**Court:** [Select jurisdiction, e.g., United States District Court for the [specific district]]
**Date:** [Insert decision date if available]
**Overview:**
In the case of United States v. Quentin Perry, the defendant, Quentin Perry, was charged with [specific charges, e.g., possession with intent to distribute, conspiracy, etc.], stemming from actions that occurred on [date(s) of the incident].
**Facts:**
On [insert date], law enforcement officials conducted an investigation into allegations of drug trafficking in [location]. During the investigation, agents were able to gather evidence linking Quentin Perry to [specific activities, e.g., the sale of narcotics, possession of illegal substances, etc.]. This evidence included [e.g., surveillance footage, eyewitness testimonies, physical evidence such as drugs or paraphernalia].
Following this, officers executed a search warrant at [location], where they discovered [details of the findings, e.g., illegal drugs, firearms, large sums of cash]. Perry was apprehended at the scene and subsequently charged with [list applicable charges].
**Legal Issues:**
The case raised several key legal issues, including:
1. **Admissibility of Evidence:** Whether the evidence obtained during the search warrant execution was admissible in court.
2. **Possession Intent:** Whether the prosecution could prove that Perry had the intent to distribute the substances found.
3. **Constitutional Rights:** Any claims made by the defense regarding violations of Perry's constitutional rights during the arrest or investigation.
**Procedural History:**
Perry was arraigned on [date], where he pleaded [guilty/not guilty]. The case proceeded to [trial/pre-trial hearings], where motions were filed on both sides, including motions to suppress evidence and motions to dismiss charges.
**Outcome:**
[Insert the verdict or decision of the court, e.g., "The jury found Perry guilty on [date], and he was sentenced to [insert sentence details, e.g., years of imprisonment, fines, etc.]" or "Perry's motion to suppress evidence was denied, leading to a trial where he was found not guilty."]
**Conclusion:**
The case of United States v. Quentin Perry illustrates key issues related to drug trafficking laws, the importance of evidence admissibility, and the procedural rights of defendants. It highlights the balancing act courts must perform between law enforcement duties and the protection of individual rights under the Constitution.
[Note: This is a general template. For accurate details such as dates, specific charges, and outcomes, please refer to the official court records or legal database.]