Case Summary
**Case Summary: United States v. Rafael Romero-Duarte**
**Docket Number:** 7839359
**Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., United States District Court, etc.]
**Date:** [Specify date of the decision or occurrence]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** United States of America
- **Defendant:** Rafael Romero-Duarte
**Background:**
Rafael Romero-Duarte was charged with [specific charges, if known, e.g., illegal re-entry after deportation, drug trafficking, etc.]. The case arises from events that occurred on [specific date or time frame], regarding violations of federal law [specify any relevant statutes if available]. The defendant, previously deported from the United States, was alleged to have re-entered the country unlawfully.
**Key Facts:**
1. **Prior Removal:** Romero-Duarte had been deported on [specific date] after being convicted of [related offenses, if available], which barred him from re-entering the United States without proper authorization.
2. **Illegal Re-entry:** Evidence presented showed that Romero-Duarte was found in [specific location] on [specific date] and lacked legal documentation allowing him to be in the country.
3. **Arrest and Charges:** Following his apprehension, Romero-Duarte was charged under [relevant statutes, e.g., 8 U.S.C. § 1326], which makes it illegal for a previously deported individual to re-enter the United States without permission.
**Legal Proceedings:**
- [Specify if there were any pre-trial motions, plea discussions, or if the accused went to trial]
- The defendant’s legal team argued [any defenses raised, e.g., lack of knowledge of the deportation, procedural errors, etc.], while the prosecution presented evidence including [summarize the evidence and any witness testimonies].
**Judgment:**
- The court [decided, verdict reached, sentenced] on [date]. The verdict was [guilty/not guilty] regarding the charges of illegal re-entry.
- If applicable, the sentencing concluded with [specific penalties, such as imprisonment, fines, supervised release, etc.].
**Conclusion:**
The case of United States v. Rafael Romero-Duarte serves as a significant example of the enforcement of immigration laws in the context of illegal re-entry. The implications of the ruling affect not only Romero-Duarte but also reflect broader issues within immigration policy and enforcement in the United States.
---
*Note: Please insert the missing specific information as available to provide a complete case summary.*