Legal Case Summary

United States v. Ray Mettetal, Jr.


Date Argued: Thu Oct 26 2017
Case Number: 16-6871
Docket Number: 6181388
Judges:J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Diana Gribbon Motz, Pamela A. Harris
Duration: 54 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Ray Mettetal, Jr.** **Docket Number:** 6181388 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling/Decision] **Overview:** The case of United States v. Ray Mettetal, Jr. involves allegations against Ray Mettetal, who is charged with [insert specific charges, e.g., conspiracy, drug offenses, fraud, etc.]. The case is notable for its implications on [insert relevant legal principles, statutes, or constitutional issues]. **Factual Background:** Ray Mettetal, Jr. was implicated in a scheme involving [briefly describe the relevant facts of the case, such as the nature of the alleged crime, key events, and context surrounding the charges]. Law enforcement agencies initiated an investigation after [insert any triggering event, such as tips, surveillance, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several important legal questions, including [list key legal issues, such as the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of specific laws, or challenges to procedures used in the investigation]. These issues are central to the prosecution's arguments and Mettetal's defense. **Court's Findings:** The United States District Court evaluated the evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense. The court addressed [summarize any critical rulings made by the court, such as whether to admit certain pieces of evidence, the interpretation of laws, or the applicability of legal standards]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of the case [insert findings and the court's ultimate decision, such as whether Mettetal was convicted or acquitted, any sentences handed down, or appeals filed]. This case underscores the complexities of [highlight any broader implications for law enforcement, legal standards, or similar cases]. **Significance:** The decision in United States v. Ray Mettetal, Jr. serves as a reference point for future cases involving [discuss the relevance of the case outcomes for future legal proceedings or its impact on specific laws or practices]. **Next Steps:** [Outline any pending actions, such as appeals or further legal proceedings, if applicable.] --- Note: For a complete summary, specific details about the charges and court findings should be filled in based on the actual case details. If you require a more tailored summary or further specifics, please provide additional context or information.

United States v. Ray Mettetal, Jr.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available