Legal Case Summary

United States v. Raymond Bullette, III


Date Argued: Fri Mar 24 2017
Case Number: 15-4408
Docket Number: 4622032
Judges:Allyson K. Duncan, Barbara Milano Keenan, Stephanie D. Thacker
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Raymond Bullette, III** **Docket Number:** 4622032 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling if available] **Overview:** The case of United States v. Raymond Bullette, III involves criminal charges brought against the defendant regarding violations of federal law. The charges stemmed from an investigation into Bullette's alleged involvement in [briefly describe the nature of the crime, e.g., drug trafficking, bank fraud, weapons charge, etc.]. **Facts of the Case:** 1. **Parties Involved:** - Plaintiff: United States of America - Defendant: Raymond Bullette, III 2. **Background:** - On [insert relevant date], federal authorities began investigating allegations against Bullette. This investigation included [describe investigative methods used, such as surveillance, wiretaps, informants, etc.]. - Evidence collected during the investigation included [detail the nature of the evidence, e.g., documents, personal testimonies, video recordings]. 3. **Charges:** - Raymond Bullette, III was charged with [list specific charges] under [cite relevant sections of the U.S. Code]. - The charges were based on [explain the basis for the charges, e.g., distribution of controlled substances, conspiracy, etc.]. **Legal Proceedings:** - Following the indictment, a series of pre-trial motions were filed, including [mention any significant motions, e.g., motion to suppress evidence, motion to dismiss, etc.]. - During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence showing that [summarize key prosecution evidence]. - The defense argued that [summarize the defense’s argument and key evidence presented]. **Ruling:** - The judge ruled on the admissibility of certain evidence and directed the jury on legal standards applicable to the case. - Eventually, the jury returned a verdict of [guilty/not guilty] on [date of verdict]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Raymond Bullette, III concluded with significant legal implications regarding [insert any implications, like sentencing, setting precedent, etc.]. The court's decision highlighted [insert any notable aspects of the ruling or trial that may impact future cases]. **Next Steps:** - Following the verdict, sentencing is scheduled for [insert date if applicable], where the court will determine the appropriate punishment for Bullette based on the charges and the nature of the crimes committed. **Note:** For more specific details regarding the proceedings, evidence, and legal implications, it is recommended to refer to the official court documents or legal databases containing the full case record.

United States v. Raymond Bullette, III


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available