Case Summary
**Case Summary: United States v. Raymond Shoemaker**
**Docket Number**: 2661814
**Court**: United States District Court
**Date**: [Provide specific date of the decision if available]
**Background**:
Raymond Shoemaker was charged with [insert specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, fraud, weapons possession, etc.], stemming from an investigation by federal law enforcement agencies. The case arose from [briefly describe the circumstances leading to the charges, such as a police raid, tip-off, surveillance, etc.]. The prosecution alleged that Shoemaker was involved in [details of the criminal activity, e.g., distribution of narcotics, illegal firearm possession, etc.], and presented evidence including [mention types of evidence presented, such as witness testimony, physical evidence, electronic records, etc.].
**Key Issues**:
1. **Admissibility of Evidence**: A significant issue in this case was the admissibility of certain pieces of evidence, which the defense argued were obtained in violation of Shoemaker's Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure.
2. **Intent and Knowledge**: The government needed to prove that Shoemaker knowingly participated in the criminal activities he was charged with.
3. **Sentencing Guidelines**: If convicted, discussions regarding how the sentencing guidelines would apply based on the nature and severity of the offenses were pivotal.
**Ruling**:
The court ruled on the admissibility of evidence, determining that [summarize the ruling regarding evidence]. The judge found that [summarize the legal reasoning behind the decision]. After hearing the evidence presented by both sides, the court concluded [summarize the court's findings on Shoemaker's involvement and intent]. Ultimately, Raymond Shoemaker was found guilty/not guilty on [list specific charges] and was sentenced to [summarize the sentence if applicable].
**Conclusion**:
The case of United States v. Raymond Shoemaker reflects important legal principles regarding search and seizure, and the requirements for proving intent in criminal prosecutions. The rulings made during the trial set precedents that may influence future cases involving similar legal issues.
**Note**: For a more detailed understanding, including specific dates, outcomes, and additional legal arguments, consult the full court documents or legal databases.