Legal Case Summary

United States v. Robert Ranjel


Date Argued: Tue Nov 01 2016
Case Number: 15-3778
Docket Number: 4484563
Judges:Not available
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Robert Ranjel** **Docket Number:** 4484563 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Relevant Dates] **Background:** In the case of United States v. Robert Ranjel, the defendant, Robert Ranjel, was charged with [insert specific charges, e.g., possession of illegal substances, firearms offenses, etc.]. The charges arose from an investigation initiated by federal law enforcement agencies, which alleged that Ranjel was involved in [briefly describe the nature of the criminal activity, e.g., drug trafficking, illegal possession of firearms, etc.]. **Facts:** During the investigation, authorities gathered evidence that included [list the types of evidence, such as surveillance materials, wiretaps, eyewitness accounts, etc.]. The prosecution argued that Ranjel's actions constituted a violation of federal statutes regarding [insert relevant laws or statutes violated]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolved around [insert key legal issues, such as the admissibility of evidence, constitutional rights, etc.]. Ranjel’s defense team argued that [insert the defense's arguments, e.g., improper search and seizure, lack of probable cause, etc.]. **Ruling:** [Insert the court's ruling, including any motions filed by either side, verdicts, or sentencing outcomes, if applicable. Include whether the defendant was found guilty or not guilty, and any specific penalties or sentences handed down.] **Conclusion:** The United States v. Robert Ranjel highlights [insert any broader implications of the case, such as its impact on federal law enforcement practices, legal precedents, etc.]. The ruling in this case serves as a significant reference for future cases involving similar legal issues. **Note:** Further details regarding the case’s developments, including sentencing or appeals, can be included based on additional context or updates to the case.

United States v. Robert Ranjel


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available