Legal Case Summary

United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado


Date Argued: Mon Sep 13 2004
Case Number: 03-30285
Docket Number: 7859395
Judges:Wallace, Gould, Berzon
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado** **Docket Number:** 7859395 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Overview:** The case of United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado concerns the defendant, Rodriguez-Preciado, who faces federal charges related to [specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, illegal re-entry, etc.]. The case is significant as it addresses key issues surrounding [legal issues involved, such as constitutional rights, procedural adherence, etc.]. **Facts:** Rodriguez-Preciado was arrested on [insert date of arrest] during [describe circumstances leading to arrest, such as a traffic stop, surveillance operation, etc.]. Law enforcement agents conducted a search that yielded [insert details of evidence found, such as drugs, firearms, etc.]. The prosecution alleges that the evidence outlines a clear connection to illegal activities. **Legal Proceedings:** Upon arrest, Rodriguez-Preciado was charged with [list charges, e.g., possession with intent to distribute, illegal entry]. The defendant pleaded [guilty/not guilty] at arraignment. During pre-trial proceedings, several motions were filed, including [mention any significant motions, such as a motion to suppress evidence, change of venue, etc.]. The defense contended that [briefly summarize the defense's argument, e.g., illegal search and seizure, insufficient evidence, etc.], while the prosecution maintained that the evidence obtained was lawful and crucial to establishing a case against Rodriguez-Preciado. **Court Ruling:** On [insert date], the court issued a ruling on the motions and the overall case. The ruling discussed the application of [legal standards, case law relevant to the decision], and the court ultimately decided to [summarize the court's findings, rulings on motions, and any conclusions reached]. The judge emphasized [key points made in the decision]. **Outcome:** As a result of the ruling, Rodriguez-Preciado was [found guilty/not guilty, sentence imposed if applicable]. The case has implications for [discuss broader legal implications, how it affects future cases, and any precedents it may set]. **Conclusion:** United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado illustrates [mention any key takeaways or themes such as the importance of constitutional rights, law enforcement protocol, the judicial process, etc.]. The case serves as a reminder of [insert a concluding thought about the case's impact or significance]. **Note:** For precise details, including specific dates, charges, motions, and outcomes, please refer to the official court documents or legal databases.

United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available