Legal Case Summary

United States v. Romo


Date Argued: Tue Feb 15 2005
Case Number: 04-30131
Docket Number: 7858549
Judges:B. Fletcher, McKeown, Gould
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Romo** **Docket Number:** 7858549 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling] **Overview:** In the case of United States v. Romo, the United States government brought charges against the defendant, Romo, under federal law for [insert specific charges, e.g., drug trafficking, possession with intent to distribute, etc.]. The case centers on allegations of [briefly describe the nature of the alleged crime, such as the circumstances surrounding the arrest, evidence collected, etc.]. **Facts:** The key facts of the case include: - The arrest of Romo occurred on [date] in [location]. - Law enforcement agents discovered [describe any evidence, such as substances, firearms, or other incriminating materials]. - [Include any relevant background information about Romo, such as prior criminal history, if applicable.] **Legal Issues:** Romo's defense raised several legal arguments, including: - [List any pretrial motions, such as motions to suppress evidence based on Fourth Amendment violations.] - Challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the prosecution. - Arguments regarding [any applicable legal doctrines, such as entrapment, duress, or jurisdictional issues]. **Court's Ruling:** The court ruled on [insert the date of ruling]. In its decision, the court found that [summarize the key findings of the court]. The ruling addressed [discuss any key legal principles or precedents established or referenced by the court]. Ultimately, the court concluded that [describe the outcome, whether Romo was found guilty or not guilty, and any sentencing that may have been imposed]. **Conclusion:** The case of United States v. Romo underscores the complexities of federal criminal law and the importance of the legal process in ensuring justice is served. The outcome may have implications for [discuss any broader implications for similar cases, changes in law enforcement practices, or public policy concerns]. **Next Steps:** Following the ruling, Romo has the option to appeal the decision in a higher court. [Insert any additional information about the status of the case, such as deadlines for appeals or subsequent legal proceedings.] **Note:** Specific details such as dates, charges, and evidence must be filled in based on the actual case information available from legal records.

United States v. Romo


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available