Legal Case Summary

United States v. SHAMBLIN


Date Argued: Wed May 05 2004
Case Number: 03-10120
Docket Number: 7859923
Judges:Silverman, W. Fletcher, Rawlinson
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Shamblin** **Docket Number:** 7859923 **Court:** United States District Court **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Key Facts:** The case of United States v. Shamblin involves the defendant, [Defendant's Full Name], who was charged with [insert relevant charges, e.g., drug trafficking, fraud, etc.]. The prosecution alleged that Shamblin engaged in activities that violated federal law, specifically [detail the nature of the violation, e.g., possession with intent to distribute controlled substances, conspiracy to commit fraud, etc.]. **Procedural History:** Shamblin was arrested on [insert arrest date] following an investigation conducted by [insert agency, e.g., FBI, DEA, etc.]. The indictment was filed on [insert indictment date], leading to pre-trial motions and hearings to determine admissibility of evidence and other legal issues. **Issues:** The key legal issues in this case included: 1. [Insert first legal issue, e.g., the admissibility of evidence obtained during the arrest] 2. [Insert second legal issue, if applicable, e.g., the interpretation of statutory language] 3. [Insert any additional issues] **Arguments:** - **Prosecution's Argument:** The prosecution argued that sufficient evidence existed to prove Shamblin's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [Include specific evidence or witness testimonies presented by the prosecution]. - **Defense's Argument:** The defense contended that the evidence was insufficient to support the charges and raised concerns about [insert any defense strategies, such as violation of constitutional rights, lack of evidence, etc.]. **Ruling:** The court [insert the ruling made by the judge, e.g., denied the motion to suppress evidence, found the defendant guilty, etc.]. The decision was based on [explain the rationale behind the court's decision, referencing key legal precedents or statutes]. **Outcome:** The outcome of the case resulted in [describe the verdict, such as guilty, not guilty, sentence imposed, etc.]. Shamblin was sentenced to [insert sentence, if applicable, e.g., a specific number of years in prison, probation, fines, etc.]. **Significance:** This case is significant as it raises important questions regarding [insert key themes, such as federal versus state jurisdiction, interpretation of laws, rights of the accused, etc.]. The ruling may influence future cases involving similar legal issues. **Conclusion:** United States v. Shamblin underscores the complexities of federal law and the judicial process, illustrating the balance between prosecutorial efforts and the rights of defendants within the legal system. **Note:** For more specific details including dates and case specifics, refer to the official court documents and filings associated with this case.

United States v. SHAMBLIN


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available