Legal Case Summary

United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr.


Date Argued: Mon May 03 2010
Case Number: 09-30160
Docket Number: 7847688
Judges:Hall, Wardlaw, Gould
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr.** **Docket Number:** 7847688 **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date] **Overview:** In the case of United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr., the defendant, Thomas Kriesel, Jr., was charged with [insert specific charges] following an investigation conducted by federal law enforcement agencies. The case involved allegations of [insert brief description of allegations, e.g., fraud, drug trafficking, etc.]. **Background:** Thomas Kriesel, Jr. was accused of engaging in [insert specifics about the nature of the criminal conduct, such as the method of operation, scale of the crime, or any other pertinent details]. The investigation revealed [insert key findings of the investigation]. **Procedural History:** The case was initiated with an indictment filed in [insert month and year]. Following the indictment, Kriesel Jr. was arraigned on [insert date], where he pleaded [insert plea, e.g., guilty, not guilty]. Pretrial motions were filed regarding [insert any significant pretrial motions, such as motions to suppress evidence]. **Trial:** The trial commenced on [insert date], during which the prosecution presented evidence including [insert type of evidence, such as witness testimony, documents, etc.]. The defense argued [insert defense strategy or arguments], attempting to cast doubt on the prosecution’s case. **Outcome:** The jury deliberated and rendered a verdict of [insert verdict, e.g., guilty or not guilty] on [insert date]. Following the verdict, sentencing took place on [insert sentencing date], where Kriesel Jr. received a sentence of [insert sentence details, such as years in prison, fines, probation, etc.]. **Implications:** This case underscores the federal government’s commitment to prosecuting [insert relevant type of crime, e.g., financial crimes, narcotics offenses]. The outcome serves as a precedent for similar cases and may influence future prosecutorial strategies in this area of law. **Conclusion:** United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr. exemplifies the complexities of federal prosecutions and the balancing act of presenting evidence while ensuring defendants' rights are preserved throughout the legal process. (Note: Please provide specific details such as dates, charges, and additional context as needed to complete the summary accurately.)

United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available