Legal Case Summary

United States v. Ulibas


Date Argued: Wed May 07 2003
Case Number: 02-10233
Docket Number: 7861621
Judges:Leavy, Rymer, Tg Nelson
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. Ulibas, Docket No. 7861621** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date of Decision:** [Insert Date] **Judges:** [Insert Judges' Names] **Background:** The case of United States v. Ulibas arose from charges brought against the defendant, [Defendant's Full Name], for alleged violations of federal law. The specifics of the charges included [briefly outline the charges, such as drug trafficking, firearm offenses, etc.]. The incidents leading to these charges occurred in [provide relevant geographical location and timeline]. **Facts:** - The defendant, Ulibas, was implicated in a series of [describe the nature of the crime briefly, e.g., drug distribution activities] that involved [summarize key evidence or events, such as police investigations, surveillance, or transactions]. - Law enforcement agencies conducted an investigation that included [details of the investigation, such as wiretaps, informants, or controlled buys]. - Ulibas was arrested on [insert arrest date] following [describe the circumstances of the arrest]. **Legal Issues:** The case raised several legal issues, including but not limited to: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., the legality of search and seizure conducted by law enforcement] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., admissibility of evidence gathered from wiretaps] 3. [Issue 3: e.g., potential violations of the defendant's rights during arrest and interrogation] **Rulings:** - The court ruled on various motions filed by both the prosecution and the defense, addressing [specify key motions, such as motions to suppress evidence or motions for pretrial hearings]. - [Summarize the rulings made by the court, such as upholding certain pieces of evidence or dismissing specific charges.] **Conclusion:** Ultimately, the court [describe the outcome, e.g., found Ulibas guilty, acquitted the defendant, or reached a plea agreement]. The decision was significant in addressing [discuss any broader implications of the case or interpretation of law]. **Implications:** This case serves as a pivotal moment in [mention any relevant legal standards, changes in law, or important precedents established]. The ruling has wider implications for [discuss the impact on law enforcement practices, defendants’ rights, etc.]. **Next Steps:** Following the outcome, [mention any upcoming actions such as sentencing phases, appeals filed by either party, or further hearings]. (Note: The details in the summary, including names and rulings, should be filled in with accurate information pertaining to the specific case.)

United States v. Ulibas


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available