Legal Case Summary

United States v. William Zamastil


Date Argued: Thu Dec 05 2013
Case Number: 11-10560
Docket Number: 7836877
Judges:Silverman, Callahan, Smith
Duration: 39 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: United States v. William Zamastil** **Docket Number:** 7836877 **Court:** [Assuming Federal District Court] **Date:** [Assuming date of the case's conclusion] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** United States of America - **Defendant:** William Zamastil **Background:** William Zamastil was charged with offenses under federal law. The specifics of the alleged criminal conduct involved [insert relevant charges, e.g., drug trafficking, fraud, firearms offenses, etc.], which are considered serious violations under U.S. federal statutes. **Facts of the Case:** The case arose from [insert details of how the case developed, e.g., investigation by law enforcement, evidence obtained, arrests made, etc.]. During the investigation, authorities collected [insert types of evidence, such as witness testimonies, physical evidence, surveillance footage, etc.], which they argued directly implicated Zamastil in the alleged criminal activities. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues derived from the charges against Zamastil included: 1. Whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support the charges. 2. Challenges regarding the admissibility of certain evidence based on [potential legal standards or precedents]. 3. The application of sentencing guidelines in the event of a conviction. **Court Proceedings:** The case proceeded to [trial or plea agreement], where both sides presented their arguments. The prosecution aimed to establish Zamastil's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while the defense [insert defense arguments, e.g., lack of evidence, mistaken identity, or alternative explanations]. **Outcome:** The court ultimately rendered its decision on [insert date of the ruling]. [Summarize the verdict, sentence, or any plea agreement reached—if Zamastil was found guilty, acquitted, or if the charges were dismissed.] **Conclusion:** The ruling in United States v. William Zamastil serves as a significant case reflecting the application of federal law in [insert specific context or legal principle relevant to the case]. The outcome emphasizes [insert implications of the verdict, any legal precedents set or reaffirmed, and its impact on future cases or laws]. **Note:** This summary is a fictional outline created for the purpose of providing a case summary format. Actual details about the case should be obtained from legal databases or court records for accuracy and completeness.

United States v. William Zamastil


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available