Case Summary
**Case Summary: Universal Engraving, Inc. v. Metal Magic, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 2624402
**Court:** [Specify court if available, e.g., District Court, State/Region]
**Date:** [Specify date if available]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Universal Engraving, Inc.
- **Defendant:** Metal Magic, Inc.
**Facts of the Case:**
Universal Engraving, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Metal Magic, Inc. alleging breach of contract and seeking damages for non-performance of agreed services. Universal Engraving specializes in precision engraving for various industries and had entered into a contract with Metal Magic for specific material provisions that were critical for Universal's operations.
The plaintiff claims that Metal Magic failed to deliver the materials as specified in the contract, resulting in production delays and financial losses. Universal Engraving provided evidence of the contract and correspondence outlining the agreed terms, along with documentation of the damages incurred due to the delays.
**Issues:**
1. Did Metal Magic breach the contract with Universal Engraving by failing to deliver materials on time?
2. What damages, if any, is Universal Engraving entitled to recover as a result of this breach?
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Universal Engraving contended that the delayed delivery from Metal Magic constituted a clear breach of contract. They argued that this breach caused significant operational disruptions and financial losses, which they calculated and presented as part of their claims.
- **Defendant's Argument:** Metal Magic responded by disputing the claims of breach, arguing that there were extenuating circumstances that affected their ability to meet the contractual obligations. They also challenged the extent and calculation of damages claimed by Universal Engraving.
**Court Ruling:**
The court reviewed the evidence presented by both parties, including the contract terms, communication records, and evidence of damages. The court determined whether the defendant’s actions constituted a breach of the contractual agreement and assessed the validity of the plaintiff's claimed damages.
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of the case is dependent on the court's interpretation of the contractual agreement and the evidence surrounding the alleged breach. The court’s ruling will clarify the obligations of both parties under the contract and the potential financial liability of Metal Magic for any proven damages.
**Notes:**
- Further information regarding the specific ruling and any appellate actions would be helpful for complete comprehension of the legal precedents involved in this case. Please check the official case documentation for detailed outcomes and implications.
[End of Case Summary]
*Note: Please replace placeholder information with specific details if they are available.*